The Indus Waters Treaty should be terminated, not held in abeyance

With climate change, new hydro-technologies, and terrorism reshaping South Asian politics, a fundamental rethink on Indus Waters Treaty is imperative.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi chaired a meeting on the Indus Waters Treaty in New Delhi, 26 September 2016. | Photo Courtesy: Prime Minister’s Office, Government of India

Audio Option is available to paid subscribers. Upgrade your plan

Audio version only for premium members

The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) no longer functions as a simple bilateral water-sharing agreement; it has become a sensitive fixture in South Asia’s strategic landscape. Once hailed as a model that insulated water from politics, the treaty now sits under strain from accelerating climate stress, new hydro-technologies, and a security environment reshaped by Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism.

New Delhi’s decision to place the treaty in abeyance in April 2025, following the terrorist attack at Pahalgam, and the subsequent legal tussle at The Hague, are not procedural footnotes. They are warning signs: unless New Delhi, Islamabad, and the World Bank—the international mediator that brokered the pact—agree on a path to modernisation, the carefully apportioned flows of the Indus basin could shift from being one of the region’s rare sources of cooperation into a new axis of conflict.

' This article is only available to subscribers of India's World. Already a subscriber? Log in

Subscribe to India’s World to read more.

Login or Register To Unlock The Content!

Latest Stories

Related Analysis